Tìm tài liệu

An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application

An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application

Upload bởi: tuananhnam1234

Mã tài liệu: 48713

Số trang: 89

Định dạng: docx

Dung lượng file: 734 Kb

Chuyên mục: Kinh tế quốc tế

Info

For more than 70 years, the International Chamber of Commerce ICC has formulated the so-called UCP-The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. The first attempt to codify letter of credit practice started in 1929 when ICC introduced its “Uniform Regulations and Commercial Documentary Credits”. Although the failure to gain wide acceptance, these rules provided a foundation for further developments. Then, in 1933, ICC issued “The Uniform Customs and Practice for Commercial Documentary Credits” and this set of rules received formal acceptance in more than 40 countries all over the world. It is, however, not until the issue of UCP in 1962, that global acceptance took place. Since then the rules has been regularly updated in 1974, 1983 (UCP 400), 1993 (UCP 500) and now we have the sixth Revision-UCP 600 which came into effect in July 2007.

This study, “An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application”, aims to consider the differences from UCP 500 to UCP 600. The research questions posed in this study are: “Where the rules have been amended?” and “Which results in a potential changes in practice?”. Basing on the findings, this study will draw recommendations for parties involved in L/C transaction in applying the new revision UCP 600 before reaching the conclusion.

To achieve the above objectives, the study is divided into 3 chapters

Chapter I: “Literature review”, provides an in-depth background that covers all theoretical issues relevant to UCP set of rules and documentary letter of credit.

Chapter II: “Key changes under UCP 600 in comparison to UCP 500”, points out structural changes as well as key changes in UCP 600 in comparison with UCP 500. An evaluation of improvements and remaining problems is also discussed in this chapter.

Chapter III: “Recommendations for better UCP 600 application”, based on the findings, the chapter will put an end to the study with recommendations for main parties involved in letter of credit transaction to suggest the best way in applying the new UCP 600.

Phần bên dưới chỉ hiển thị một số trang ngẫu nhiên trong tài liệu. Bạn tải về để xem được bản đầy đủ

  •  

    FOREIGN TRADEUNIVERSITY

    FACULTY OF BUSINESS ENGLISH

         AN ANALYSIS OF KEY CHANGES UNDER UCP 600 COMPARED TO UCP 500 AND     

            RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BETTER UCP 600 APPLICATION

     

    SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

    OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

    OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN BUSINESS ENGLISH

     

     

     

    Student        : Luong Thanh Tan

    Class           : A3 - K43 - BBe

    Surpervisor: Nguyen T. Thanh Minh (Ph.D)

     

     

     

  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • Đang tải dữ liệu ...
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application
  • An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application

GỢI Ý

Những tài liệu gần giống với tài liệu bạn đang xem

Một số vấn đề áp dụng UCP 500 trong thanh ...

Upload: nam_nguy3n

📎 Số trang: 69
👁 Lượt xem: 1829
Lượt tải: 17

Những vấn đề đặt ra khi áp dụng UCP 600 tại ...

Upload: khacvinh_dang

📎 Số trang: 88
👁 Lượt xem: 337
Lượt tải: 19

Tìm hiểu chỉ số đánh giá hiệu quả KPI KPI ...

Upload: hongduyen

📎 Số trang: 79
👁 Lượt xem: 1192
Lượt tải: 24

QUAN TÂM

Những tài liệu bạn đã xem

An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 ...

Upload: tuananhnam1234

📎 Số trang: 89
👁 Lượt xem: 617
Lượt tải: 16

CHUYÊN MỤC

Kinh tế Kinh tế quốc tế
An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application For more than 70 years, the International Chamber of Commerce ICC has formulated the so-called UCP-The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. The first attempt to codify letter of credit practice started in 1929 when ICC introduced docx Đăng bởi
5 stars - 48713 reviews
Thông tin tài liệu 89 trang Đăng bởi: tuananhnam1234 - 02/03/2024 Ngôn ngữ: Việt nam, English
5 stars - "Tài liệu tốt" by , Written on 02/03/2024 Tôi thấy tài liệu này rất chất lượng, đã giúp ích cho tôi rất nhiều. Chia sẻ thông tin với tôi nếu bạn quan tâm đến tài liệu: An analysis of key changes in UCP 600 compared to UCP 500 and Recommendations for better application